Cast-in-place core
For those grains that have a cast-in-place core, the grain is nearly ready for firing after removal from the mould. The de-moulding process is illustrated as a series of steps in Figure 3. The core rod is first extracted, and should slide out with little effort. The filament tape is then pulled out of the core in an unwinding fashion. A hairdryer is next used to soften the hot-melt glue retaining the base. A box-cutter knife may then be used to cut through the glue allowing the base to "snap off". The grain is then extracted from the mould, again minimal effort is normally required.

Figure 3 -- De-moulding procedure
Grains that have the outer surface inhibited are next cut into appropriate length segments that comprise the BATES grain. Such segments are illustrated in Figure 4, together with a Rod & Tube grain, which remains at its original length.
Grains that have the outer surface uninhibited will be glossy owing to contact with the plastic casting liner and as such will be epoxy-rich . The surface should therefore be lightly sanded to expose the oxidizer particles to aid ignition.
If any surface flaws such as small voids are present, these should first be filled with 5-minute epoxy to eliminate the extraneous burning area.
Figure 4 -- Finished BATES segments with cast-in-place 20 mm core (left)
Rod & Tube grain (right)
After the strand has fully cured, the straw is slit open lengthwise using a sharp bladed knife, and the strand removed. To help ensure even burning, the strand should have its surface inhibited with a coating of paint (hi-heat aluminum paint is best). Two "timing" marks are drawn on the strand using a pen. The distance between the two marks ("gauge length") is carefully measured and recorded. One end of the strand is sanded flat, then the strand is mounted vertically to a firm base using hot-melt glue, with the flat end on top. To perform the burn rate test, the strand is ignited on top, and using a stopwatch, the time duration for the flame front to traverse between the two timing marks is measured. The best technique for igniting the strand is to utilize a thin, flat metal bar heated with a propane torch. When red hot, the bar is pressed flat against the top of the strand. This ensures that the complete strand surface begins to burn at once.
Density Check
The mass density of the propellant grain should be checked. This will give a good indication of the quality of the packing that was done. A density that is notably low may be a result of voids or other bubbles present in the grain. The presence of a small number of bubbles is generally not harmful. Due to the nature of the packing process, bubbles will migrate to the outside surface of the grain as the propellant is compressed during packing and will be visible after curing as surface voids (as mentioned earlier, the larger voids should be filled with 5-minute epoxy). The Theoretical Maximum Density (TMD) for the RNX propellants is as follows:
Formulation | grams/cc | lb/cu.in. |
RNX-57 | 1.869 | 0.0675 |
RNX-71V | 1.848 | 0.0667 |
Table 2 -- Ideal mass densities
Density is given by grain mass divided by the grain volume. Volume is given by:

Where D or Do is the grain outside diameter, and Di is the grain inside diameter, L is the grain length.
As an example, consider an RNX-71V grain segment of 159 grams mass, Do = 4.5 cm, Di = 2.0 cm, and L = 7.0 cm. The calculated volume is 89.3 cc., with the resulting density of 1.780 gram/cc. The density ratio is therefore 1.780/1.848 = 0.95.
Measurement of density for an inhibited grain is, of course, complicated by the presence of the inhibitor. This should be taken into account when measuring both grain mass and grain volume. As such, the inhibitor weight should be measured and recorded prior to casting the grain. As well, an accurate measurement of the inhibitor thickness is required.
I have consistently obtained measured density of 93% to 95% of TMD for both the RNX-57 and RNX-71V grains. If the measured density is less than 92%, this indicates there may be a problem with the grain. This could be a result of:
- Voids present within the grain. Unfortunately, it is not feasible to determine if this is so without cutting open the grain.
- Formulation incorrect. Perhaps a weighing error during preparation.
- Vacuum processing not performed satisfactorily (RNX-71V only). Perhaps the bowl was insufficiently evacuated.
- Measurement or round-off error in determining mass density. Scale resolution should be no less than 1% of the grain mass. For example, if the grain mass is 100 grams, the scale should be capable of resolving 1 gram or better. Determining the precise grain diameter or length is often not possible and as such an average value must be used. Try remeasuring the grain dimensions with better precision.